Sunday, February 17, 2013

Glass ceiling




Statistics shows that women income rose faster than men’s during the past decade. However, the “glass ceiling” still exists for women in the work place. In economics, glass ceiling means that the unseen barrier that keeps minorities and women from getting ahead, regardless of their qualifications or achievements.
Ms Williams, of the Women’s resource Centre, called on Government to establish a Fender Unit and to strengthen legislation to prevent discrimination against women. The 2010 Employment Survey indicated more females were in higher paying jobs compared to their male counterparts.  However while females are generally better off in terms of income, males continue to enjoy higher salaries in occupations grouped as senior officials, managerial and professional. As we learned in readings in last week, at every level of academic achievement, women’s median earnings are less than men’s median earnings, and in some cases, the gender pay gap is larger at higher levels of education. Claudette Fleming, executive director of Age Concern, responded to the report.
“It is important that we include ‘age’ as a basis for discrimination within the human rights legislation so that those seniors who need to can continue to work and earn an income past 65 years old,” Ms Fleming said.
 However, the statistics also show that working age people must prepare to finance their retirement as early and as much as they can. The appropriate balance is related to personal responsibility and government support. “We are hopeful that the Government will soon have CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women) extended,” Ms Williams said. CEDAW is known as an international Bill of Rights for women. CEDAW is about eliminating discrimination against women and promoting equality. I agree that government should establish a Gender Unit to oversee policy formation, training and monitoring of policies to identify and correct gender deficiencies in every aspect of community life.

3 comments:

  1. I liked that you included ‘ageism’ in your post because it’s a very prevalent thing. It’s so unfair that when a man gets to be 65, he’s treated with dignity and respect at his place of work and the possibility of him continuing to work remains. Whereas if a woman is 65, she is treated with disdain in the workplace—unless of course it’s a female dominated area of work, then she’s a veritable matriarch provided that a man isn’t around to nab the higher salary. To be old and female in this country is to essentially be unhireable, which is a disgusting standard.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Glass Ceiling is a huge issue and it ties in with the Gender Wage Gap. It is a great idea to have some sort of reinforcement (such as the Gender Unit). At the same time, if they do not get laws into affect that will support the reinforcement then there is nothing to reinforce. It is that cycle of oppression that keeps running through our daily lives. It is very frustrating that we do not have a country to support this. Women's rights are almost nothing if we do not have the support we so desperately need.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The glass ceiling is undoubtedly still a big issue in the United States. Unfortunately it is not a problem that can simply be resolved overnight. For example; If all hiring practices miraculously started employing with true equality tomorrow, it would take decades before these equality biased hiring practices would show demographically in the workplace. For this ideal worker demographic to exist in true equilibrium the generations of people hired in previous generations must be “purged” from the system. Because of this phenomenon we must look closely at any statistical numbers portraying percentages of men and women in in different positions and therefore different pay scales. This is not to say that there is not still a large discrepancy between the wages and hiring practices from men and women, just that we must keep the statistical numbers in perspective to where we are at in this great “purging” of inequality in the job pool.

    ReplyDelete